Spring critique 2014

This Saturday I presented this term’s artwork for review by my peers and professors.  Here are a few photos of how it was arranged for critique.


uarts spring crit 2014 b

uarts spring crit 2014

uarts spring crit 2014 c

I’ve been asked to explore more display options.  Cutting them out and presenting the dolls in site-specific installations was one suggestion.  Removing the black mat boards was a popular remark.  Making art books from these pages was a third.

After the critique, I removed the mats, and will try my next set of costumes on a 300# paper (since the 140# requires stretching in order to forestall warping).  When you stretch watercolor paper, the edges are permanently marred by the gummed paper.  Allowing those gummed edges to show didn’t bother those critiquing my work this Saturday.

It does bother me.

To use a food analogy, the same carefully cooked meal will be experienced (and tasted) differently whether:  1) eaten off paper plates while standing at the sink, or 2) from tastefully plated dishes in a leisurely manner.  The black mats may not be the correct plating for this visual meal, but I see no reason to ask my viewers/guests to eat over the sink.

There’s a balance.  I just need to find it.


As always, there are a number of artists I was encouraged to study:

Amy Cutler

Shahzia Sikander

Dottie Attie

Portia Munson

Hilary Harkness

3 responses to “Spring critique 2014”

  1. […] mentioned some of the feedback I received from the first critique of term in this post.  The task during the week following was to use those suggestions and […]

  2. I’d like to thank you for the efforts you have put in writing this blog.

    I really hope to check out the same high-grade content from you later on as well.
    In fact, your creative writing abilities has inspired me to get my own, personal blog now ;)

  3. I hope you leave another comment with a link to your blog!

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: